Centralising Video Ad Creative for Speed, Control and Visibility - Adstream
Centralising Video Ad Creative for Speed, Control and Visibility

Centralising Video Ad Creative for Speed, Control and Visibility

An interview with Dan Brackett, co-founder and chief technology officer at Extreme Reach

In these marketing times of “you snooze, you lose,” speed to market with fast and flawless execution is paramount. Creative asset workflow efficiency is quickly becoming one of the most critical components to a successful campaign in the cross-screen media ecosystem.

Here, Dan Brackett, co-founder and chief technology officer at Extreme Reach, offers his insight into what can help a brand shorten the time between approving creative and campaigns launching exactly as planned on every screen.

Q. How is video ad serving different from linear TV delivery, and why do so many brands and agencies choose different solutions for each?

Did you ever see the Disney film, The Parent Trap? It’s a story of identical twins separated at birth who find each other years later and realise how much they have in common despite completely different upbringings. This is a perfect metaphor for two disciplines with different beginnings that are increasingly finding each other because they were meant to be united.

Ultimately, advertisers and their agency partners produce great creative. Media strategists devise masterful yet complex communication plans. These two things have to get connected — the creative must be formatted to match a myriad of destination specs and delivered to all the parties that need them for a campaign to launch. The end goal is campaigns launching on time so that finished creative plays in front of consumers, according to plan. In today’s world, that can mean a commercial for traditional TV or a video ad that will be seen on a laptop or smartphone or in the living room via over-the-top devices. The avenues leading to viewers are multiplying, but the goal is the same regardless of channel.

Q. What are the implications of selecting different point solutions for standard video ad serving and TV delivery?

What’s lost on most people — even those in the industry — is how much brute-force manual grunt work is involved in the workflows that guide the finished creative to where it ultimately plays. Ironically, this is especially true in the digital sphere.

The number of Excel sheets, emails, teams, languages, platforms, and assets that go into digital campaigns is mind-boggling. There is a widely felt pain across all the executional facets of the business — from digital video activation teams to talent and rights professionals to AdOps folks on the receiving end of creative assets.

The problem is easy to explain. Everyone needs the creative assets in unique formats and all parties need to know that the rights and talent payments are set up for all the different media placements. Above all, campaigns need to launch on time.

The consequences of separate workflows and the lack of holistic creative asset management have not been pretty. Having multiple content repositories and numerous teams dipping in and out of them introduces so many opportunities for quality and formatting errors, delayed campaign starts, expensive talent payment and rights violations, and, ultimately, just a lot of chaos where seamless video execution can — and should — reign.

Q. Can you focus a little more on why the industry finds itself at a breaking point?

We’re all more interested in what the plumbing delivers rather than how it works. So, I think the race to media innovation and using data-driven automation to reach consumers all over the place left the ecosystem focused so much on that aspect that there was no room to think about the foundational piece of how the creative assets would need to be sourced and deployed to match the speed of media.

One might think that if the consumer experience, value, and ROI of brand ads on traditional TV versus on IP-based platforms are such wildly different animals, it makes sense to choose different asset-delivery solutions for each. It’s easy to see how the mechanics got swept up in all that.

What makes sense on an intuitive level actually totally fails on the execution front. The idea that video ad serving and TV delivery should be approached differently and handled by siloed teams is actually counterproductive. TV and digital video may be two different media that came of age in different eras, but there are so many parallels in how the creative should be sourced and deployed that the same workflows and proven paradigms should apply to both. That’s why it’s important to demystify video ad serving.

What’s interesting about the digital video world is that media decisions can now be made in fractions of a second, but before a campaign launches, the process to find and format and get all the creative ready is sluggish, manual, and antiquated. Our research shows that it can take weeks between creative being finished and the campaign going live in digital video. Contrast this with linear TV, where a national brand ad can be finished in post-production and on-air in mere hours or even minutes.

So, here it’s helpful to think about video ad serving more in the context of what it does rather than what it is.

Q. What does a better path forward look like?

When every aspect of the ad industry today feels harder than ever before, the solution in this area actually makes execution easier, with the double advantage of preparing all sides involved in execution for whatever the future brings.

With all due respect to the way video ad serving was “raised,” brands are best served when one partner is accountable for full-lifecycle creative asset management, including all modes of delivery and talent and rights compliance wherever ads play. These functions share common bonds and are the interrelated means to the same end-game.

A permission-based, safe, and secure centralised platform for all creative assets, which can be tapped by both linear and digital video teams, better supports today’s content-everywhere mandate. It’s a world simpler, smoother, and more accurate than siloed creative distribution approaches can deliver. And sophisticated, automated workflow processes that connect multiple brand and agency teams are a must-have as the media environment expands beyond what can be handled manually.

There are so many opportunities for advertisers to reach their audiences in creative and compelling ways. Given the advanced technologies of today, getting brand stories to screens on time and perfectly formatted should happen seamlessly and reliably, and that’s exactly the case with a creative platform purpose built for the way “TV” is consumed today. To bring it back to The Parent Trap metaphor, it’s time to bring our parents back together and reunite the video family.


Did you know that Adstream has been acquired recently by Extreme Reach? Together we solve some of the biggest challenges facing marketers, their agencies and production partners around the world. Find out more here.

Author

Melinda McLaughlin

Melinda McLaughlin

Explore our products

One Delivery

Fast, secure delivery, any media, any time, any market

Cross-media delivery

One Solutions

Connect partners and manage assets, from creation to storage

Workflow solutions

One Services

Regulatory & practical compliance support to get your content live

Campaign clearance

One Analytics

Make sense of all your data in one place

Insight & analysis
Send now










    or
    Learn more










      52.28.1.74
      https://www.adstream.com/blog-centralising-video-ad-creative-for-speed-control-and-visibility